The cryptocurrency gambling industry continues to expand, with the world’s largest crypto casinos processing billions of dollars in deposits annually. New market intelligence from Tanzanite.xyz highlights the scale of the sector, the dominance of established operators and the rapid growth of several emerging brands.
According to the latest data, Stake is the world’s biggest crypto casino by deposit volume, recording approximately $24 billion over the past year. This puts the operator far ahead of its closest competitors, Roobet and Rainbet, which recorded $5.13 billion and $3.18 billion respectively.
The broader market is also experiencing substantial growth. Tanzanite reports total tracked deposit volume of $46.6 billion, an increase of 41.9% compared with the previous year.
However, the figures reveal more than simple market expansion. Some established brands are experiencing declining transaction volumes, while newer competitors are gaining ground at an extraordinary pace.
Rainbet, for example, recorded 444% growth in annual deposit volume, while Thrill experienced an even larger percentage increase.
The data provides an interesting picture of how the global cryptocurrency gambling industry is evolving in 2026.
Top 15 Biggest Crypto Casinos in the World 2026
The following ranking is based on cryptocurrency casino deposit volume over a one-year period, using Tanzanite.xyz data available on 5 November 2026.
| Rank | Crypto casino | Deposit volume | YoY change | Deposits | Average deposit |
| 1 | Stake | $24.00B | +29% | 33.7M | $711 |
| 2 | Roobet | $5.13B | +18% | 8.69M | $590 |
| 3 | Rainbet | $3.18B | +444% | 11.0M | $290 |
| 4 | Shuffle | $2.38B | +7% | 6.22M | $383 |
| 5 | Duel | $2.25B | N/A | 1.87M | $1,200 |
| 6 | BC Game | $2.12B | −12% | 1.91M | $1,110 |
| 7 | Gamdom | $2.02B | −64% | 2.39M | $842 |
| 8 | StakeUS | $1.18B | −2% | 2.48M | $474 |
| 9 | 1WIN | $1.11B | +122% | 4.90M | $227 |
| 10 | Sportsbet.io | $718M | −47% | 332K | $2,160 |
| 11 | Thrill | $658M | +999%* | 1.41M | $467 |
| 12 | Winna | $637M | N/A | 779K | $818 |
| 13 | Cloudbet | $537M | N/A | 156K | $3,450 |
| 14 | Casinobet | $367M | +114% | 32.7K | $11,200 |
| 15 | Razed | $299M | +26% | 599K | $500 |
Source: Tanzanite.xyz, 5 November 2026. One-year reporting period. Values are rounded. N/A indicates that no comparable percentage change was displayed. The +999% figure is shown as reported.
The ranking reveals considerable differences between operators, both in terms of total transaction volume and the average value of individual deposits.
While Stake leads by a substantial margin, several smaller platforms demonstrate strong growth and distinct transaction patterns.
Stake Dominates the Global Crypto Casino Market
Stake’s position at the top of the ranking is particularly striking. With approximately $24 billion in annual deposits, the platform accounts for more than half of the $46.6 billion in total tracked market deposit volume.
The operator also recorded 33.7 million deposits during the period, representing an increase of 16% compared with the previous year.
Its average deposit value was approximately $711.
These figures underline Stake’s substantial position within the cryptocurrency gambling industry.
The company has developed a business model combining online casino entertainment, sports betting, proprietary casino games and cryptocurrency payments.
Its international visibility has also been supported by major sponsorship agreements, influencer partnerships and digital marketing.
The latest figures suggest that Stake continues to expand despite its already considerable scale. Annual deposit volume increased by 29%, indicating that the operator’s transaction activity is still growing.
Perhaps most importantly, Stake’s deposit volume is more than four times that of Roobet, its nearest competitor. This creates a substantial gap between the market leader and the remaining operators.
Roobet Remains the Second-Biggest Crypto Casino
Roobet occupies second place with approximately $5.13 billion in annual deposits. The platform recorded 8.69 million deposits, representing a 59% increase in the number of transactions compared with the previous year.
However, its total deposit volume increased by a more modest 18%. This difference is particularly interesting.
It suggests that deposit frequency has grown considerably faster than the total amount deposited, consistent with a shift towards smaller average transactions.
Roobet’s average deposit value currently stands at approximately $590. The operator has built its position through a combination of cryptocurrency casino games, live entertainment, brand partnerships and a distinctive digital identity.
Although Stake remains far ahead, Roobet’s continued growth demonstrates the importance of established operators in the crypto gambling market.
Read more: Biggest Crypto Casino Hot Wallet Balances
Rainbet Emerges as One of the Fastest-Growing Crypto Casinos
Rainbet is arguably one of the most interesting companies in the latest ranking. The operator recorded approximately $3.18 billion in annual deposit volume, placing it third globally.
More importantly, its deposit volume increased by an extraordinary 444% compared with the previous year. The number of deposits increased even faster, rising by 263% to approximately 11 million.
Rainbet therefore recorded more individual deposits than Roobet, despite having a substantially smaller total deposit volume.
The explanation lies partly in the average transaction value.
Rainbet’s average deposit was approximately $290, compared with $590 at Roobet and $711 at Stake. This indicates a different transaction profile, characterised by a larger number of relatively smaller deposits.
For the iGaming industry, Rainbet’s performance demonstrates how quickly an operator can gain scale within the cryptocurrency gambling segment.
Its growth also raises an important question: can emerging crypto casinos continue expanding at this pace, or will growth begin to normalise as their businesses mature?
Shuffle and Duel Complete the Top Five
Shuffle ranks fourth with $2.38 billion in annual deposits. Its deposit volume increased by 7%, while the number of deposits rose by 46% to 6.22 million. The difference between transaction growth and deposit-volume growth is another example of changing payment patterns within the market.
Shuffle’s average deposit value was approximately $383.
Duel follows in fifth place with $2.25 billion in annual deposit volume.
The platform recorded 1.87 million deposits, with an average transaction value of approximately $1,200.
This is considerably higher than the averages recorded by Rainbet, Shuffle and Roobet. The contrast illustrates how operators can achieve similar overall deposit volumes through very different combinations of transaction frequency and average deposit size.
BC Game and Gamdom Experience Declining Deposit Volumes
Not every established crypto casino is experiencing growth. BC Game ranks sixth with approximately $2.12 billion in annual deposits, representing a 12% decline compared with the previous year.
The number of deposits fell by 45% to approximately 1.91 million. Gamdom experienced an even more substantial decline.
Despite ranking seventh with $2.02 billion in deposit volume, the operator recorded a 64% decrease compared with the previous year.
These movements highlight the competitive nature of the cryptocurrency gambling industry. Brand recognition and established market positions do not necessarily guarantee continued growth.
However, declining deposit volumes should not automatically be interpreted as declining revenue or profitability.
Changes in customer activity, payment methods, transaction frequency and market coverage can all influence the figures.
1WIN, Thrill and Casinobet Record Strong Growth
Beyond Rainbet, several other operators recorded substantial year-over-year increases.
1WIN – Deposit Volume Up 122%
1WIN ranks ninth with approximately $1.11 billion in annual deposits.
The operator recorded a 122% increase in deposit volume, while its number of deposits increased by 123% to 4.9 million.
Its average deposit value was approximately $227, one of the lowest among the top 15 operators.
This suggests that 1WIN’s transaction activity is concentrated around relatively small deposits compared with several competitors.
Thrill – Exceptional Percentage Growth
Thrill ranks eleventh with approximately $658 million in deposit volume.
Tanzanite displays an increase of 999% compared with the previous year, alongside a similarly large increase in the number of deposits.
The platform recorded approximately 1.41 million deposits, with an average value of $467.
This is one of the most striking growth figures in the dataset.
However, extremely high percentage growth should be interpreted carefully, particularly when the previous year’s starting volume is not provided.
Casinobet – Growth of 114%
Casinobet ranks fourteenth with approximately $367 million in annual deposits. The operator recorded 114% growth in deposit volume and a 128% increase in deposit count.
Its transaction profile is unusual, with only approximately 32,700 deposits and an average deposit value of $11,200. This is the highest average deposit among the 15 ranked operators.
Such figures may indicate a concentration of larger transactions, although the dataset does not establish the number of unique customers or their individual gambling behaviour.
Sportsbet.io Records a 47% Decline
Sportsbet.io ranks tenth with approximately $718 million in annual deposit volume. The operator recorded a 47% decline compared with the previous year.
The number of deposits also decreased by 37%, reaching approximately 332,000. Despite the decline, Sportsbet.io maintained a relatively high average deposit value of $2,160.
This places it among the operators with the largest average transaction sizes in the ranking.
The figures demonstrate that deposit volume and average deposit value can tell very different stories about an operator’s transaction activity.
Cloudbet and Casinobet Stand Out for High Average Deposits
The ranking becomes particularly interesting when comparing average deposits.
While the largest operators generate substantial transaction volumes through millions of deposits, some smaller platforms record much larger average transactions.
| Crypto casino | Average deposit |
| Casinobet | $11,200 |
| Cloudbet | $3,450 |
| Sportsbet.io | $2,160 |
| Duel | $1,200 |
| BC Game | $1,110 |
| Gamdom | $842 |
| Winna | $818 |
| Stake | $711 |
| Roobet | $590 |
| Razed | $500 |
Casinobet leads this comparison with an average deposit of approximately $11,200, followed by Cloudbet at $3,450.
By comparison, Stake’s average deposit is $711, despite its much larger overall deposit volume.
This illustrates the importance of examining transaction characteristics rather than relying exclusively on total deposits.
However, average deposit size should not be confused with average customer spending.
A single customer may make multiple deposits during the reporting period.
Razed Enters the Top 15 With $299 Million in Deposits
Razed occupies fifteenth place in the global ranking, with approximately $299 million in annual deposit volume. The operator recorded 26% growth compared with the previous year.
Its number of deposits increased by 25% to approximately 599,000, while the average deposit value was $500.
Although considerably smaller than the market leaders, Razed’s positive growth contrasts with the declines recorded by several established competitors.
Its position also demonstrates the diversity of operators competing in the crypto gambling market.
Global Crypto Casino Deposit Volume Reaches $46.6 Billion
One of the most significant findings in the Tanzanite data concerns the overall market.
Total tracked deposit volume reached $46.6 billion over the one-year reporting period, representing an increase of 41.9% compared with the previous year.
This suggests that cryptocurrency gambling transaction activity is continuing to expand.
Several factors may contribute to this development, including the growing use of digital assets, wider availability of stablecoins, increased operator competition and the development of crypto-native gambling products.
However, the supplied data does not isolate the contribution of these factors.
The increase should therefore be understood as evidence of growing tracked deposit activity rather than proof of any single underlying cause.
The Top Three Crypto Casinos Control 69.4% of Deposit Volume
The market is also highly concentrated. According to Tanzanite, the three largest operators account for approximately 69.4% of total tracked deposit volume.
Those operators are Stake, Roobet and Rainbet. Their combined deposit volume is approximately $32.31 billion.
This concentration demonstrates the substantial commercial advantage enjoyed by the market’s largest platforms. It also creates an interesting competitive dynamic.
While the biggest brands dominate overall transaction volume, smaller operators can still achieve rapid percentage growth.
Biggest Gainers and Losers in the Crypto Casino Market
The market data identifies several standout changes in annual deposit volume.
| Category | Operator | Reported change |
| Biggest gainer | Thrill | +999% displayed |
| Major gainer | Rainbet | +444% |
| Major gainer | 1WIN | +122% |
| Major gainer | Casinobet | +114% |
| Biggest loser | Sportsbet.io | −47% |
| Major decline | Gamdom | −64% |
| Decline | BC Game | −12% |
Tanzanite’s insights panel identifies Thrill as the biggest gainer, reporting growth of approximately 5,793.4% versus the previous year, and Sportsbet.io as the biggest loser, with a decline of 47.0%.
The market table displays Thrill’s growth as +999%, which appears to be a capped presentation of the larger percentage change.
Gamdom’s reported 64% decline is numerically larger than Sportsbet.io’s decline. The supplied source does not explain why its insights panel nevertheless identifies Sportsbet.io as the biggest loser.
This discrepancy is worth keeping in mind when interpreting the summary statistics.
What Does Deposit Volume Actually Measure?
Deposit volume represents the total value of deposits recorded for an operator during a specified period. It is an important indicator of transaction activity, but it is not equivalent to revenue.
For example, a customer might deposit $100, withdraw the remaining balance and later deposit another $100.
Those transactions contribute $200 to deposit volume, even though the operator has not necessarily earned any revenue.
The distinction is particularly important in the cryptocurrency gambling industry, where deposits and withdrawals can occur frequently.
Deposit Volume vs Gross Gaming Revenue
Gross gaming revenue, or GGR, is generally calculated as player stakes minus player winnings. Deposit volume measures money entering an operator’s payment system.
These are fundamentally different metrics. A casino with a high deposit volume does not necessarily generate a proportionally high level of GGR.
Similarly, deposit volume does not directly reveal profitability, customer acquisition costs or the number of unique players.
Why the Number of Deposits Matters
Deposit counts help explain how an operator generates transaction volume. Stake recorded 33.7 million deposits, while Rainbet recorded 11 million and Roobet approximately 8.69 million.
These figures indicate the frequency of deposit transactions rather than the number of individual customers.
Combining deposit volume with deposit count provides a more detailed picture of each operator’s transaction profile.
Why Average Deposit Size Matters
Average deposit size is calculated by dividing total deposit volume by the number of deposits. It helps distinguish platforms processing large numbers of smaller transactions from those recording fewer, higher-value deposits.
However, it does not establish customer income, lifetime value or average gambling losses.
What the Data Reveals About the Future of Crypto Gambling
Several important trends emerge from the latest figures.
1. Established Market Leaders Remain Extremely Powerful
Stake’s $24 billion deposit volume demonstrates the scale achieved by the largest cryptocurrency gambling brands.
Its substantial lead creates a significant competitive gap between the market leader and other operators.
2. Emerging Operators Can Grow Rapidly
Rainbet, Thrill, 1WIN and Casinobet recorded substantial increases in deposit volume.
Their performance suggests that the market remains open to competitive shifts despite its concentration.
3. Transaction Frequency Is Becoming an Important Indicator
Several operators recorded faster growth in deposit counts than in total deposit volume.
This makes transaction frequency an important additional metric when evaluating market development.
4. Not Every Established Brand Is Growing
The declines recorded by Gamdom, Sportsbet.io and BC Game demonstrate that growth is uneven.
Competitive positions can change significantly within a single reporting period.
5. Different Operators Have Very Different Transaction Profiles
Average deposits range from $227 at 1WIN to $11,200 at Casinobet.
These differences highlight the variety of payment and transaction patterns within the crypto gambling industry.
Conclusion – The World’s Biggest Crypto Casinos in 2026
The latest Tanzanite data reveals a cryptocurrency gambling market characterised by substantial transaction volumes, rapid growth and intense competition.
Stake remains the clear market leader, with approximately $24 billion in annual deposits.
Roobet follows with $5.13 billion, while Rainbet has emerged as one of the industry’s most notable growth stories, recording $3.18 billion in deposits and 444% annual growth.
Across the wider market, tracked deposit volume reached $46.6 billion, increasing by 41.9% compared with the previous year.
At the same time, the performance of individual operators varies considerably.
Some brands are recording exceptional growth, while others are experiencing substantial declines.
For iGaming industry professionals, the data highlights the importance of looking beyond traditional rankings based on website traffic or brand awareness.
Deposit volume, transaction frequency and average deposit values provide additional perspectives on the competitive structure of the cryptocurrency gambling industry.
As the sector continues to develop, these metrics will remain valuable for understanding which operators are expanding, which are losing momentum and how the balance of the market is changing.
Source: Tanzanite.xyz – Crypto Casino Market Breakdown and Insights, 5 November 2026.
Reporting period: One year, as presented in the supplied market data.
Methodology note: The article uses the market figures and growth indicators supplied by Tanzanite.xyz. Deposit volume represents tracked transaction activity, not audited gambling revenue, profitability or verified unique customer counts. Reported figures are rounded, and the underlying coverage and transaction attribution methodology have not been independently verified.
